Поиск по материалам сайта
Cлово "VERONICA"

1. Введение

Входимость: 1. Размер: 17кб.

2. The book about the motherland: analyzing discursive practices

Входимость: 1. Размер: 19кб.

1. Введение

Входимость: 1. Размер: 17кб.

Часть текста: Seria 9. Warszawa. 21-29. 4. Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. NY. 5. Критику Heimat см. в сборнике Hermand, Jost and James Steakley (eds). 1996. Heimat, Nation, Fatherland. The German Sense of Belonging. NY. См. также интересную критическую историю послевоенного западногерманского патриотического фильма в Kaes, Anton. 1989. From Hitler to Heimat. The Return of History as Film. Harvard and London. 6. Об особенностях имен, которые не имеют экстенсионалов и в своей семантике зависят от условий культурного конструирования понятий, см. Арутюнова, Н.Д. (отв. ред.). 1989. Логический анализ языка. Проблемы интенсиональных и прагматических контекстов. Москва. 7. Барт, Ролан. 1999. Фрагменты речи влюбленного. Москва. 8. Здесь и далее - там же, стр. 81-82. 9. „Nationalism is not the awakening of nations to self-consciousness: it invents nations where they do not exist." Gellner, Ernest. 1964. Thought and Change. London, 169. О роли „воли к нации" в формировании национализма - Gellner, Ernest. 1987. Nationalism and the Two Forms of Cohesion in Complex Societies. Culture, Identity and Politics. Cambridge, London and NY, 6-28. 10. Featherstone, Mike. 1995. Undoing Culture: Globalization, Postmodernity and Identity. London, 1995, Chapter 6. 11. Известия , 3(354), 1997. 12. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London, Chapter 2 „Cultural Roots". Андерсон описывает нацию как культурный артефакт, а ее...

2. The book about the motherland: analyzing discursive practices

Входимость: 1. Размер: 19кб.

Часть текста: by multiple linguistic practices whose figures and symbols can be found both in public and in private discourses of Self and Other. The phraseology of Rodina permeates the Russian discourse of identification throughout its Modern history, starting with Petrine bureaucracy through various political regimes of the empire, through Stalinist society and on till today's languages of the post-communist commercialized mass media. One would be quite justified in believing Rodina to be the „main word" of Russian culture, a total signifier that claims absolute supremacy over identity and dominates the discourse irrespective of those political or economic principles that underlie Russian society during its different historical periods. Being an important element in the ideological lexicon, Rodina, however, is not a mere representation of „false consciousness" and cannot be dismissed as such. This figure supersedes the limits that are traditionally given to political terms in cultural critique. Being an important element of the language of power, the discourse of the Motherland also constitutes an important work of collective imagination, deeply woven into the texture of individual life styles and individual self-representations. Rodina is a number one value for the ideologue, but it is no less dear to the heart of the poet; it is equally relevant for a loyal citizen of the state as for a dissident political exile, and in the discourse of the average individual it receives as much attention as in the production of ideological propaganda that seeks to dominate the subjectivity of that very average individual. In other words, Rodina is an efficient discursive machine for the production of symbolic togetherness: it has a tremendous potential in eliminating political difference inside society producing, at the same time, a prohibitive barrier against the external Other. The...